camofox-browservsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 12 027 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with