camofox-browservswindmill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 18 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 163 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.853.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
windmill scores 77/100 against 75/100 for camofox-browser, so it is the safer default.
windmill ships more often: 163 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; windmill needs more configuration.
camofox-browser details →windmill details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep windmill, compare it with