camofox-browservsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 12 044 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →Whirl details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Whirl, compare it with