camofox-browservswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 027 | 4 032 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 | +133 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; wanderer needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with