camofox-browservs墨台 · VibeHolding
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | 墨台 · VibeHolding | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; 墨台 · VibeHolding needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →墨台 · VibeHolding details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep 墨台 · VibeHolding, compare it with