camofox-browservsunraid-config-guardian
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | unraid-config-guardian | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unraid-config-guardian.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; unraid-config-guardian needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →unraid-config-guardian details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep unraid-config-guardian, compare it with