camofox-browservsUglyFeed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | UglyFeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 12 037 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +280 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+280 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →UglyFeed details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep UglyFeed, compare it with