camofox-browservsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with