camofox-browservstootik
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | tootik | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 12 051 | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +294 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 18 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.25.5 · 3 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 47/100 for tootik, so it is the safer default.
tootik ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; tootik needs more configuration.
camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+294 stars in 30 days).
camofox-browser details →tootik details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep tootik, compare it with