camofox-browservsHuginn
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| camofox-browser | Huginn | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 50 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +181 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 75/100 for camofox-browser, so it is the safer default.
camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.
If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.
camofox-browser details →Huginn details →
Swap a project
Keep camofox-browser, compare it with
Keep Huginn, compare it with