Calibre WebvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 18 488 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Fluent | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Calibre Web.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with