Calibre Webvsself-hosted-livesync-server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web | self-hosted-livesync-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #37 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 18 488 | 274 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Fluent | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; self-hosted-livesync-server needs more configuration.
Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web details →self-hosted-livesync-server details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web, compare it with
Keep self-hosted-livesync-server, compare it with