Calibre Webvslidarr-on-steroids
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web | lidarr-on-steroids | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #20 of 31 in Music |
| GitHub stars | 18 486 | 529 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +255 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Fluent | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 47/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; lidarr-on-steroids needs more configuration.
Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+255 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web details →lidarr-on-steroids details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web, compare it with
Keep lidarr-on-steroids, compare it with