Calibre Web AutomatedvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 6 506 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +170 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web Automated ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; Calibre Web Automated needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+170 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with