Calibre Web AutomatedvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 6 506 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +170 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web Automated ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web Automated is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with