Calibre Web AutomatedvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 6 503 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +171 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web Automated is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+171 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with