Calibre Web AutomatedvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 6 504 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Calibre Web Automated needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with