Calibre Web AutomatedvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 6 506 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +170 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v1.11.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web Automated is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+170 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with