Calibre Web AutomatedvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 6 508 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web Automated ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web Automated is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with