Calibre Web Automatedvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 6 503 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +171 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web Automated ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Calibre Web Automated needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+171 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with