Calibre Web AutomatedvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 503 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +171 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 73/100 for Calibre Web Automated, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with