Calibre Web AutomatedvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 502 | 549 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +170 | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 18 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+170 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with