Calibre Web Automatedvsmultiwoven
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | multiwoven | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 6 509 | 1 683 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 26 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.
multiwoven ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web Automated is easier to run; multiwoven needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →multiwoven details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep multiwoven, compare it with