Calibre Web AutomatedvsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 6 506 | 5 004 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +170 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 20 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; Calibre Web Automated needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+170 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →MCSManager details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep MCSManager, compare it with