Calibre Web Automatedvshass-configurator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | hass-configurator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 508 | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web Automated ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →hass-configurator details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with