Calibrevstunesynctool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre | tunesynctool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Ebook Management | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 26 268 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +269 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 1 |
| Latest release | v9.17.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre scores 83/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
Calibre ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
Calibre is growing faster right now (+269 stars in 30 days).
Calibre details →tunesynctool details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre, compare it with
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with