cadvisorvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cadvisor | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 72/100 for cadvisor, so it is the safer default.
cadvisor ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
cadvisor details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep cadvisor, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with