elasticsearchvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| elasticsearch | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Search Engines | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 78 421 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +452 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 11 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 83/100 for elasticsearch, so it is the safer default.
elasticsearch ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; elasticsearch needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
elasticsearch details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep elasticsearch, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with