cadvisorvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cadvisor | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 | 24 044 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +784 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 72/100 for cadvisor, so it is the safer default.
cadvisor ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, cadvisor is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+784 stars in 30 days).
cadvisor details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep cadvisor, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with