Caddyvsteslamateapi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | teslamateapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #3 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 78 532 | 257 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 470 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v1.25.0 · 7 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 46/100 for teslamateapi, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; teslamateapi needs more configuration.
Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 470 stars in 30 days).
Caddy details →teslamateapi details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep teslamateapi, compare it with