Dufsvsteslamateapi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | teslamateapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 997 | 257 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.25.0 · 7 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 46/100 for teslamateapi, so it is the safer default.
teslamateapi ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; teslamateapi needs more configuration.
Dufs is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →teslamateapi details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep teslamateapi, compare it with