CaddyvsSwizGuard
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | SwizGuard | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #46 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 78 524 | 232 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 489 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 42/100 for SwizGuard, so it is the safer default.
Caddy ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SwizGuard.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; SwizGuard needs more configuration.
Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 489 stars in 30 days).
Caddy details →SwizGuard details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep SwizGuard, compare it with