CaddyvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 78 533 | 25 416 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 471 | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.
SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; SpacetimeDB needs more configuration.
Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 471 stars in 30 days).
Caddy details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with