C-SSHvsWeTTY
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| C-SSH | WeTTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 6 in SSH | #6 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 187 | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +31 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.9.7 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
WeTTY scores 69/100 against 38/100 for C-SSH, so it is the safer default.
WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for C-SSH.
If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; C-SSH needs more configuration.
WeTTY is growing faster right now (+31 stars in 30 days).
C-SSH details →WeTTY details →
Swap a project
Keep C-SSH, compare it with
Keep WeTTY, compare it with