BytebasevsHuly
Two self-hosted Jira alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bytebase | Huly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 651 | 28 002 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +241 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 2 |
| Latest release | 3.24.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.7.426 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | EPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Huly scores 74/100 against 71/100 for Bytebase, so it is the safer default.
Bytebase ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Huly.
If you want the quickest setup, Bytebase is easier to run; Huly needs more configuration.
Bytebase details →Huly details → All Jira alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Bytebase, compare it with
Keep Huly, compare it with