BunkerWebvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 135 | 23 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +1 002 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 22 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 002 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →Super Productivity details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Super Productivity, compare it with