BunkerWebvsOwncast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Owncast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 11 138 | 11 632 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Owncast scores 73/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.
If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb details →Owncast details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Owncast, compare it with