BunkerWebvsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 135 | 109 453 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +9 546 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 546 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with