budibasevsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 28 364 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
budibase scores 74/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →Workout.cool details →