BTCPay ServervsMedusaJs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BTCPay Server | MedusaJs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in E-commerce | #1 of 27 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 7 860 | 36 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +548 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 18 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 76/100 for BTCPay Server, so it is the safer default.
MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for BTCPay Server.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+548 stars in 30 days).
BTCPay Server details →MedusaJs details →
Swap a project
Keep BTCPay Server, compare it with
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with