BTCPay ServervsHalo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BTCPay Server | Halo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in E-commerce | #3 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 7 860 | 40 073 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +197 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 16 |
| Latest release | v2.4.6 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Halo scores 79/100 against 76/100 for BTCPay Server, so it is the safer default.
Halo ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for BTCPay Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Halo is easier to run; BTCPay Server needs more configuration.
Halo is growing faster right now (+197 stars in 30 days).
BTCPay Server details →Halo details →
Swap a project
Keep BTCPay Server, compare it with
Keep Halo, compare it with