LightpandavsTraceRoot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lightpanda | TraceRoot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 37 452 | 1 145 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +651 | +33 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Zig | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.
Lightpanda ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TraceRoot.
If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.
Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+651 stars in 30 days).
Lightpanda details →TraceRoot details →
Swap a project
Keep Lightpanda, compare it with
Keep TraceRoot, compare it with