Broccoli OSSvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Broccoli OSS | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 10 in AI Automation | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 283 | 46 462 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 26 Apr 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 47/100 for Broccoli OSS, so it is the safer default.
mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Broccoli OSS.
If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; Broccoli OSS needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).
Broccoli OSS details →mitmproxy details →