Broccoli OSSvsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Broccoli OSS | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 10 in AI Automation | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 283 | 264 906 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +8 914 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 26 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 47/100 for Broccoli OSS, so it is the safer default.
Broccoli OSS ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Broccoli OSS needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).
Broccoli OSS details →DeepSeek Harness details →