brainrotguardvsdocker-pi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| brainrotguard | docker-pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 22 in Home Server | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 396 | 11 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +114 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.33.0 · 29 Sept 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 49/100 for brainrotguard, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; brainrotguard needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+114 stars in 30 days).
brainrotguard details →docker-pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep brainrotguard, compare it with
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with