bookwyrmvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →TradingAgents details →