bookwyrmvsShellHub
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | ShellHub | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #12 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 2 243 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +175 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.28.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ShellHub scores 64/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ShellHub.
If you want the quickest setup, ShellHub is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
ShellHub is growing faster right now (+175 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →ShellHub details →