bookwyrmvsNomad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | Nomad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 17 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +80 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for bookwyrm.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →Nomad details →