bookwyrmvsmagic-frame
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | magic-frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 22 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.5.11 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for bookwyrm.
If you want the quickest setup, magic-frame is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →magic-frame details →