magic-framevsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| magic-frame | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 512 | 50 459 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 42 |
| Latest release | v1.5.11 · 29 Oct 2026 | v4.4.27 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 42 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for magic-frame.
If you want the quickest setup, magic-frame is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
magic-frame details →Mastodon details →
Swap a project
Keep magic-frame, compare it with
Keep Mastodon, compare it with